查看: 52075|回复: 397
recovery模式中的root integrity check是什么意思的解释！
root integrity check：游客，如果您要查看本帖隐藏内容请
请输入验证码：
integrity check：
本文来自移动叔叔论坛 ，详细出处请参考:
什么意思啊？？？？
来自手机版
非常感谢分享。。。。。。
xffffhi可口可乐了
来自手机版
爸爸爸爸爸爸爸爸
么意思的解释！
dddddddd顶顶顶顶顶大大大
有刷机教程吗？
学习！！！！！！！
来自手机版
我也不知道什么意思啊
来自手机版
RE: recovery模式中的root integrity check是什么意思的解释
看看啥玩意
来自手机版
………………
看看看看看
ygi tit it t
站长推荐 /2
每天不定期更新最优惠的数码及周边商品信息，让你白菜价买到心仪的商品！
即日起，只要在你所属机型的板块分享适用于该机型的手机评测、玩机心得体验、软件游戏资源即有机会获得移动叔叔现金抵用卷一张！
移动叔叔. 版权所有，专业的网络售后平台 (
商务合作||||Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23
1 3 2}) 192.168.2.48: NEEDED_PREAUTH: bbeamon@UMRK.NL for krbtgt/
UMRK.NL@UMRK.NL, Additional pre-authentication required
Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): preauth (timestamp) verify
failure: Decrypt integrity check failed
Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23
1 3 2}) 192.168.2.48: PREAUTH_FAILED: bbeamon@UMRK.NL for krbtgt/
UMRK.NL@UMRK.NL, Decrypt integrity check failed
This is basically the same error that I posted a question about here in
October 2009. Back then, the problem disappeared after a reinstall of the
client and/or server software, but an actual solution was never found.
Not having understood it, naturally the problem eventually resurfaced, so
I figured it would be better to sort it out once and for all.
The &preauth (timestamp) verify failure& error is misleading, because it
seems to suggest that there is a time synchronization error, which does
not have to be the case. I believe it says &(timestamp)& simply to remind
us that time synchronization is essential for pre-authentication.
Regarding &Decrypt integrity check failed,& it is sometimes stated that
this error is just Kerberos' way of saying that the password is
incorrect. This is true, but it can just as easily be because the server
cannot decrypt and then read a correct password.
In my case, the client-server time synchronization was correct and so was
the password. So, what's next? Luckily, I didn't have to spend too much
time searching for an answer. First, I found this:
4.2. &Decrypt integrity check failed&
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-73.html
Here, it says that the error is caused because &the encryption key used
to encrypt the data in this message didn't match the encryption key used
for decryption, and as a result the checksum comparison didn't work.& It
also says the solution &is to delete the keytabs on each machine, and
only add the host principal's key to their corresponding machine.&
That was it. All I had to do was delete /etc/krb5.keytab on both the
client *and* the server, create a new one on the server (using kadmin
with the ktadd command) and then another new one on the client (using the
same command).
In conclusion, if you believe your time and passwords are correct, but
still receive the above errors, then it could be due to an encryption
problem. Since Kerberos stores its encryption keys in those key table
files on both the servers and the clients, the solution may be to
replace them with fresh ones, starting with the KDC master server.
5541 articles.
1 followers.
is leader.
1029 Views
[PageSpeed]
On Friday, June 25, :40 AM UTC-4, Jaap Winius wrote:
& Hi folks,
& Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23=
& 1 3 2}) 192.168.2.48: NEEDED_PREAUTH: bbeamon@UMRK.NL for krbtgt/
& UMRK.NL@UMRK.NL, Additional pre-authentication required
& Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): preauth (timestamp) verify=20
& failure: Decrypt integrity check failed
& Jun 25 13:26:05 vipera krb5kdc[2171](info): AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23=
& 1 3 2}) 192.168.2.48: PREAUTH_FAILED: bbeamon@UMRK.NL for krbtgt/
& UMRK.NL@UMRK.NL, Decrypt integrity check failed
& This is basically the same error that I posted a question about here in=
& October 2009. Back then, the problem disappeared after a reinstall of the=
& client and/or server software, but an actual solution was never found.=20
& Not having understood it, naturally the problem eventually resurfaced, so=
& I figured it would be better to sort it out once and for all.
& The &preauth (timestamp) verify failure& error is misleading, because it=
& seems to suggest that there is a time synchronization error, which does=
& not have to be the case. I believe it says &(timestamp)& simply to remind=
& us that time synchronization is essential for pre-authentication.
& Regarding &Decrypt integrity check failed,& it is sometimes stated that=
& this error is just Kerberos' way of saying that the password is=20
& incorrect. This is true, but it can just as easily be because the server=
& cannot decrypt and then read a correct password.
& In my case, the client-server time synchronization was correct and so was=
& the password. So, what's next? Luckily, I didn't have to spend too much=
& time searching for an answer. First, I found this:
4.2. &Decrypt integrity check failed&
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/kerberos-faq/general/section-73.html
& Here, it says that the error is caused because &the encryption key used=
& to encrypt the data in this message didn't match the encryption key used=
& for decryption, and as a result the checksum comparison didn't work.& It=
& also says the solution &is to delete the keytabs on each machine, and=20
& only add the host principal's key to their corresponding machine.&
& That was it. All I had to do was delete /etc/krb5.keytab on both the=20
& client *and* the server, create a new one on the server (using kadmin=20
& with the ktadd command) and then another new one on the client (using the=
& same command).
& In conclusion, if you believe your time and passwords are correct, but=20
& still receive the above errors, then it could be due to an encryption=20
& problem. Since Kerberos stores its encryption keys in those key table=20
& files on both the servers and the clients, the solution may be to =20
& replace them with fresh ones, starting with the KDC master server.
Hi Jaap. I know this is 4 years after the fact, but i am hoping you can thr=
ow some light on how to reset the keytab files on both server and client. i=
cant seem to find any documentation on how to do it. I have run into the s=
ame problem. Clock and passwords look good, so i am suspecting its the keyt=
Similar Artilces:
Oct 08 16:09:14 bungarus krb5kdc[1710](info): preauth (timestamp) verify
failure: Decrypt integrity check failed
Oct 08 16:09:14 bungarus krb5kdc[1710](info): AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16
23 1 3 2}) 192.168.2.41: PREAUTH_FAILED: jjones@UMRK.NL for krbtgt/
UMRK.NL@UMRK.NL, Decrypt integrity check failed
This is an error that I can't seem to figure out. I'm trying to use SSH
to log into a Debian lenny system that uses MIT Kerberos V v1.6 and
OpenLDAP v2.4.11. The lab host, bungarus, has both the server and client
software installed. It was working for a while, but now this.
I've been following this howto:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/570
My PAM configuration is exactly the same.
It can't be a timesync problem, because I'm using only a single host. The
strange thing is, I can log in with user jjones as soon as I make a
matching unix account on the host: then I can log in with either the unix
password or the Kerberos password. But, as soon as I get rid of the unix
account, the above error returns.
Any ideas?
...Hi doc!!!!:
I am running the Sample with tutorial &Use of JAAS Login Utility and
Java GSS-API for Secure Messages without JAAS programming&
KDC is a SEAM in Solaris 9
The Code are SampleClient.java y SampleServer.java without relevant
modifications
If anyone has any ideas I'm all ears.
Waiting for incoming connection...
Got connection from client /157.253.50.59
Will read input token of size 517 for processing by acceptSecContext
true storeKey true useTicketCache false useKeyTab false
doNotPrompt false ticketCache is null KeyTab is null refreshKrb5Config
is false principal is null tryFirstPass is false useFirstPass is false
storePass is false clearPass is false
Kerberos username [root]: alexmunoz/utria.uniandes.edu.co
Kerberos password for alexmunoz/utria.uniandes.edu.co: al
[Krb5LoginModule] user entered username:
alexmunoz/utria.uniandes.edu.co
Using builtin default etypes for default_tkt_enctypes
default etypes for default_tkt_enctypes: 3 1 16.
principal is alexmunoz/utria.uniandes.edu.co@UNIANDES.EDU.CO
Acquire TGT using AS Exchange
EncryptionKey: keyType=3 keyBytes (hex dump)=0000: B9 86 13 75 13 2C
EncryptionKey: keyType=1 keyBytes (hex dump)=0000: B9 86 13 75 13 2C
EncryptionKey: keyType=16 keyBytes (hex dump)=0000: AD 58 02 92 1A 5E
BA 6D B0 64 0B 70 AE 1F
.X...^...m.d.p..
C8 16 68 A4 16 19
Using builtin default etypes for default_tkt_enctypes
default etypes...I have a slave kdc and am trying to get the master to kprop the db to the slave.
I continually get this error:
kprop: Decrypt integrity check failed while getting initial ticket
&From what I have read it is a wrong password for one of the hosts in the
database. I have removed from the DB both of the hosts and readded them back in
using kadmin, then ktadd to extract the host keytab, but I recieve the same
I have become horribly confused at this point, how do I add the hosts and get
the correct password? Do I need to run kdb5_util create -s on the slave, I
don't think I should have to but I am grasoing for straws at this point. Are
all that is needed for the slave is a kdc.conf and a krb5.conf file?
Thanks for any help,
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list
Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
&&&&& &jonr& == jonr
&& writes:
jonr& I have a slave kdc and am trying to get the master to kprop the
jonr& db to the slave.
I continually get this error: kprop: Decrypt
jonr& integrity check failed while getting initial ticket
&& From what I have read it is a wrong password for one of the hosts
jonr& database.
No; the problem here is probably the key of the master kdc's host
principal, on the slave.
The slave uses it to authenticate the peer and
compare to kpropd.conf, which lis...I had to do a bunch of account cleanups (~35,000 deletions) yesterday.
Today, I'm getting the message 'change_password: Decrypt integrity
check failed while changing password for &principal@GMU.EDU&' when
trying to change a password.
If I create a new principal, I am able to
change it's password.
I'm using kadmin.local -- we don't run kadmind.
Anyone have an idea what I deleted that I shouldn't have?
I didn't delete K/M, or host/*.
I did delete krbtgt/* and kadmin/*,
but I wanted to re-key those anyways (that's my story, and I'm sticking
I'd clearly like to avoid doing this again in the future...
Brian Davidson
George Mason University
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list
Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
&I had to do a bunch of account cleanups (~35,000 deletions) yesterday.
&Today, I'm getting the message 'change_password: Decrypt integrity
&check failed while changing password for &principal@GMU.EDU&' when
&trying to change a password.
If I create a new principal, I am able to
&change it's password.
I'm using kadmin.local -- we don't run kadmind.
&Anyone have an idea what I deleted that I shouldn't have?
I suspect that since you deleted kadmin/history, you're getting this error
from deep within the kadmin library when it's trying to acc...So, I'm trying to set up one way cross realm auth.
We have two realms... realmA and realmB
On both KDCs, we have created the principal krbtgt/realmB@realmA with the same
kvno and the same password.
I can even kinit krbtgt/realmB@realmA (which talks to the realmA server) and
get a ticket as that principal.
So, here's where things go wacky...
I kinit user@realmA - fine
I then try to do something (ssh for example) that requires a ticket in realm B.
Failure with the following error: Decrypt Integrity Check Failed - this error
also shows up in the realmB kdc log.
a klist shows:
krbtgt/realmA@realmA
krbtgt/realmB@realmB
but, of course, no service ticket.
Any thoughts on what to try/look at? As best I can tell, this should just work,
but clearly it isn't.
I haven't figured out if there is a way to kinit krbtgt/realmB@realmA to
realmB's servers to verify it isn't somehow mangling the password -- is there a
way to do this?
realmB is rhel4u4 - krb5-server-1.3.4-33
I don't know what realmA is as I don't control that KDC.
********************************
David William Botsch
Programmer/Analyst
CNF Computing
botsch@cnf.cornell.edu
********************************
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list
Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
&On both KDCs, we have created the principal krbtgt/realmB@realmA with the same
&kvno and the same password.
I know...Hello,
I'm trying to create a slave server (RHEL 3 on master and slave).
on slave :
I installed krb5-server
I create db with kdb5_util create -s
I configure and start kpropd
I have a krb5.keytab with : host/fqdn_slave@REALM (from master)
on the master :
I dump master DB and sync it witgh kprop :
32768 bytes sent.
65536 bytes sent.
69148 bytes sent.
Database propagation to slaver: SUCCEEDED
now I'm trying to kinit on the slave (I modify the krb5.conf on the
station) but :
Dec 05 13:52:57 slave krb5kdc[5065](info): AS_REQ (5 etypes {16 23 1 3
2}) 192.168.4.29(88): DECRYPT_SERVER_KEY: user@REALM for
krbtgt/REALM@REALM, Decrypt integrity check failed
Do you have a idea ?
________________________________________________
Kerberos mailing list
Kerberos@mit.edu
https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
What I did :
delete krb5-server from slave and /var/kerberos
I install krb5-server
I copy /var/kerberos/.k5.REALM from master to slave
I configure and start kpropd
have a krb5.keytab with : host/fqdn_slave@REALM (from master)
on master, sync with kprop
and on slave again : start the krb5kdc
authentification : ok
is it a good thing to copy the /k5 ?
& I'm trying to create a slave server (RHEL 3 on master and slave).
& on slave :
& I installed krb5-server
& I create db with kdb5_util create -s
& I configure and start kpropd
& I have a krb5.keytab with : host/fqdn_slave@REALM (f...Hi,
I encountered following error from /var/log/httpd/error.log as I type
username and password.
Aug 10 21:45:38 service.herdingcat.internal krb5kdc[19684](info):
AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23 1 3 2}) 192.168.122.2: NEEDED_PREAUTH:
huli@HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL for
krbtgt/HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL@HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL, Additional
pre-authentication required
Aug 10 21:45:38 service.herdingcat.internal krb5kdc[19684](info):
preauth (timestamp) verify failure: Decrypt integrity check failed
Aug 10 21:45:38 service.herdingcat.internal krb5kdc[19684](info):
AS_REQ (7 etypes {18 17 16 23 1 3 2}) 192.168.122.2: PREAUTH_FAILED:
huli@HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL for
krbtgt/HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL@HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL, Decrypt integrity
check failed
Here's the configuration for mod_auth_kerb module.
LoadModule auth_kerb_module modules/mod_auth_kerb.so
&Location /&
SSLRequireSSL
AuthType Kerberos
AuthName &Kerberos Login&
KrbMethodNegotiate On
KrbMethodK5Passwd On
KrbAuthRealms HERDINGCAT.INTERNAL
Krb5KeyTab /etc/krb5.keytab
require valid-user
&/Location&
Can anyone show me how to fix that?
...Okay... I used &tcpdump -s 65535 -w out.dump& to generate a dump of the network traffic and loaded it into Wireshark with the kerberos filter on...
I get the following:
The ticket:
Client Realm: SRV.TEST.LAN
Client Name (Principal): SlainDevil
Tkt-vno: 5
Realm: SRV.TEST.LAN
Server Name (Unknown): krbtgt/SRV.TEST.LAN
Encryption type: rc4-hmac (23)
Encryption type: des-cbc-md5 (3)
And then the error message:
error_code: KRB5KDC_ERR_S_PRINCIPAL_UNKNOWN (7)
Realm: SRV.TEST.LAN
Server Name (Service and Host): HTTP/wiki
I guess the last point is the mistake, isnt it? It should be HTTP/wiki.test.lan?
Anyone got a clue how to fix that? Currently I got no idea why this happens... :(
-------- Kabel E-Mail Reply ---------------
From: paul.
: slaindevil@kabelmail.deengert@anl.gov
Date: 04.02.:12
&text&So does that user have the correct spn. Adsiedit will tell you&/text&
&text&----- Original Message -----&/text&
&text&From:&/text&
&a href=&/sites/mybox/forms/newmail.asp?sendto= slaindevil@kabelmail.de &&
&text&slaindevil@kabelmail.de&/text&
&slaindevil@kabelmail.de /&
&text&To: Paul M&/text&
&a href=&/sites/mybox/forms/newmail.asp?sendto= deengert@anl.gov &&
&text&deengert@anl.gov&/text&...Hi,
I'm kerberizing a distributed application using the GSS-API and Kerberos
version 1.6.1.
It consists of several processes running on several hosts. There are two kind
of processes: sender processes and receiver processes. The application works
as follows: processes are grouped as pair of processes so that a sender
process and a receiver process exchange a fixed number of encrypted messages
(currently 1000).
The point is that when a lot of process pairs are running (more than 700, i.e,
1400 processes) there is always a random pair (or more than one) that fails.
After exchanging (and also encrypting and decrypting) some messages one of the
agents that are part of that pair fails when trying to decrypt the message
received, but it has decrypted all the previous messages without errors.
The failure is allways the same, when i call to gss_unwrap to decrypt the
message i get these errors:
Major status: A token had an invalid Message Integrity Check (MIC)
Minor status: Decrypt integrity check failed
The problem is solved if i retry to call gss_unwrap with the same message
after waiting for 10 or 20 milliseconds once it has failed for the first
Is there anyone knowing what happens? Could i avoid waiting and retrying
gss_unwrap?
Jose M. Such
...& So does that user have the correct spn. Adsiedit will tell you
Okay, I tried it with adsiedit and I got the following for TWikiUser:
http/wiki.test.lan
-------- Kabel E-Mail Reply ---------------
From: paul.
: slaindevil@kabelmail.deengert@anl.gov
Date: 04.02.:12
&text&So does that user have the correct spn. Adsiedit will tell you&/text&
&text&----- Original Message -----&/text&
&text&From:&/text&
&a href=&/sites/mybox/forms/newmail.asp?sendto= slaindevil@kabelmail.de &&
&text&slaindevil@kabelmail.de&/text&
&slaindevil@kabelmail.de /&
&text&To: Paul M&/text&
&a href=&/sites/mybox/forms/newmail.asp?sendto= deengert@anl.gov &&
&text&deengert@anl.gov&/text&
&deengert@anl.gov&
&text&Cc:&/text&
&a href=&/sites/mybox/forms/newmail.asp?sendto= kerberos@mit.edu &&
&text&kerberos@mit.edu&/text&
&kerberos@mit.edu /&
&text&Sent: Tue Feb 03 16:57:02 2009&/text&
&text&Subject: Re: RE: Prob: failed to verify krb5 credentials: Server not&/text&
&br /&gt...Hi List
I'm trying to configure a (Ubuntu/Debian) Linux server as a kerberos client=
with our current kerberos infrastructure. I would like users to authentica=
te ssh logins to the system
using kerberos, and so I'm using the pam_krb5 =
pam module. However, Krb5 authentication fails with the following significa=
nt error when I attempt ssh to the server:
&krb5_get_init_creds_password: Decrypt integrity check failed&
I've carefully confirmed the host principal on my KDC and krberos master, a=
nd triple-checked the krb5.conf and krb5.keytab, and connectivity between t=
he client and the KDC, as well as ntp time synchronisation between all the =
systems involved. My question is:
Is there some way I can debug
this to a=
deeper level in order to pinpoint exactly why &Decrypt integrity check fai=
led& ... I've tried sniffing packets during the communications between the =
client and the master kdc, unfortunately, the contents are largely encrypte=
d, so I can't find any further data. Also, I've searched for more detailed =
debugging options for pam_krb5, ut it doesn't look like any exist ... the k=
rb5kdc.log doesn't seem to offer more detailed information either ...
The full pam_krb5 debug
trace is as follows:
Apr 11 11:54:32 linux-server01 sshd[16073]: pam_krb5(sshd:setcred): pam_sm_=
setcred: entry (0x4)
Apr 11 11:54:32 linux-server01 sshd[16073]: pam_krb5(sshd:setcred): pam_sm_=
setcred: exit (success)
Apr 11 11...Hi,
we have a KDC (Heimdal 0.6.2) running for a test.
kinit works, it
successfully provides users with krb4 and krb5 TGTs.
But now I am trying to write a simple GSS based program and get an
error which I can not clearly classify:
0. A service principal was created on the KDC.
A krb5 keytab on the
GSS test machine was created by calling Heimdal's kadmin with
&ext_keytab *hostname*&.
The keytab contains 10 different
encryptions of the service key.
The user calling the GSS client-app
always has a clean ticket cache with only the krb5 TGT in it.
1. GSS client- and ...
Hi Michael,
& Yes, for UDP I could not find out how to let the OS select a free
& port - by default it uses always the same - which in the case of two
& servers leads to a problem.
Did you try to use ACE_Sock_Connect::bind_port()?
This is supposed to
let the OS select a free port on a particular handle!
UV, if you're
feeling adventureous you might seeing if you can make this work.
& I had long discussions about this with network experts. The smallest
& common demoninator we found to be working in our networks was 4k,
& but we had also suggessful tests with larger sizes. Best is to
& change the protocol plugin and test it in your environment - just
& change the constant.
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/ charset=us- format=flowed
All right then, thanks a lot for the advice.
I will use port numbers hashed from LAN IP numbers first and then try to
sort out the ACE_Sock_Connect::bind_port() as the proper solution.
I'll try my luck and report the results.
Douglas C. Schmidt wrote:
&Hi Michael,
&&Yes, for UDP I could not find out how to let the OS select a free
&&port - by default it uses always the same - which in the case of two
&&servers leads to a problem.
&Did you...Hi Bernhard
thanks for testing, I'll look at it, perhaps using CFBundle would give a
more versatile implementation at least for wxMac. Is there a reason why
we must use=20
NSCreateObjectFileImageFromFile ?
& -----Original Message-----
& From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Bernard=20
& Krummenacher
& Sent: Samstag, 1. April
& To: wx-users@lists.wxwindows.org
& Subject: Re: Re: wxMac: loading a dynamic library with=20
& wxDynamicLibrary fails (NSCreateObjectFileImageFromFile fails)
& Stefan Csomor &csomor &at& advancedconcepts.ch& writes:
& & if you'd use CFBundle calls do they give better error codes ?
& & Stefan
& Hi Stefan,
& Trying to load the bundle with CFBundle seems to work. I did=20
& this (borrowed from
& Apple documentation):
CFURLRef bundleURL;
CFBundleRef myB
// Make a CFURLRef from the CFString representation of the=20
// bundle's path.
bundleURL =3D CFURLCreateWithFileSystemPath(kCFAllocatorDefault,=20
CFSTR(&&Some=20
& valid absolute
& path&/DynLib.bundle&),
kCFURLPOSIXPathStyle,
...Praveen,
You could use a macro something like this:
%macro anyobs(data);
%if %sysfunc(exist(&data,DATA)) or %sysfunc(exist(&data,VIEW)) %then %
%let dsid=%sysfunc(open(&data));
%if %sysfunc(fetch(&dsid)) %then %let r=0;
%else %let r=1;
%let dsid=%sysfunc(close(&dsid));
%else %let r=-1;
Then you can use statements like
%if %anyobs(work.test)&0 %then %
%else %put WORK.TEST i
Søren
On Mon, 31 Aug :37 -0700, Praveen Sawh &pravee...On Mon 14/11/11 17:30 , Greg Hudson ghudson@MIT.EDU sent:
& On 11/14/ AM, Greg Hudson wrote:
& & I would expect 1.6.1 to send the TGS request with
& the canonicalize bit& set.
Can you look at the packet trace for 1.6.1
& (or post results if& you've already looked at it)?
Perhaps there's a
& difference there which& will explain the different outcome.
& Nevermind, I think I know why 1.6.1 succeeds and 1.9 fails.
& through1.8 have a workaround for this specific AD behavior (fall back to a
& non-referral request if you get back a TGT to the same realm), and 1.9
& only has a workaround for a related but different behavior (fall back
& ifyou get a non-TGT service name other than the requested service)
& described in the same ticket (#4955).
& I am guessing that this version of AD is implementing the behavior
& described in appendix A of the referrals draft.
It wants to change the
& client-visible server name, and the way it does so is by returning a
& TGTto the same realm with a PA-SVR-REFERRAL-DATA entry in the encrypted
& This should be easy enough to fix, since I have a test case in a local
& AD realm.
If you are in a position to test a patch, I
& otherwise it should hit a 1.9 patch release at some point.
Yes please Greg, happy to test a patch.
& I have a very strange problem with a Bind server version 9.2.5 on Fedora
& Named listen to one IPv4 address and any IPv6 address. The configuration
& has been running for many months. No changes where made recently to the
& configuration except for adding or removing slave zones.
& The symptom is that the server does not answer request to the IPv6
& address + port UDP 53. It still answers requests to the UDP and TCP port
& 53 using IPv4 and to the TCP port
53 using IPv6. Using dig on the
& server, or on any server on the same LAN, leads to the following behavior :
& - dig ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works fine
& - dig ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works once or twice immediately
& after restarting named, fails afterwards
& The logs show the following message :
& Jan 16 23:34:25 named[32125]: failed to get request's destination: failure
& Jan 16 23:34:27 named[32125]: client.c:1325: unexpected error:
& I had a look on client.c around line 1325 but it didn't help much.
& Does someone on the list have an idea on what's wrong ?
& Thanks very much in advance.
& Roland Dirlewanger
& CNRS - D?l?gation Aquitaine-Limousin
& Esplanade des Arts et M?tiers - BP ...
& I have suspicious of journaling corruption due to disk problems. Is there
& any way to check the integrity of journal file, or its content?
& The origin: A secondary receive/generate/dump a truncated zone from a
& master with journaling and IXFR enabled. I'm making the &post-mortem&
& analysis and I'd like to check that point.
& Any help would be appreciated.
& Sebastian Castro A.
bin/tests/journalprint
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2
INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
...This indicates a bug. Please send the offending integral to .
Bhuvanesh,
Wolfram Research.
...Root can steal peoples creds too, joe user's tgt is in a cache file that =
root can use. So root can be joe on the network
Sent from my GoodLink synchronized handheld ()
-----Original Message-----
Derek Harkness [mailto:dharknes@umd.umich.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10,
AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Rodrigo Castro
Cc: Daniel S kerberos@mit.edu
Subject: Re: Kerberos Ldap Integration
The general answer is no. The more specific answer is mostly no. =20
Anyone with root can su to any other account on the system, this =20
include ldap provided accounts. But even root can't
obtain another =20
user's kerberos creds without their password, key, or root access to =20
the KDC. So as long as you services require kerberos then it doesn't =20
matter is root can su to other user (well it does but it less =20
damaging).
I would recommend not using NFS for network shares or =20
NFSv4 with krb is you do. I would also require users to reenter their =20
password to change anything in the ldap directory.
Since you can't prevent this it really better to just design around it.
Derek Harkness
University of Michigan-Dearborn
Data Security Analyst
On Jun 10, 2008, at 7:06, Rodrigo Castro && wrote:
& I guess I haven't made myself clear. In my work environment we have =20
& labs. Some of them have root priveleges to administrate their own =20
& with their root account they can bec...
& & I have a very strange problem with a Bind server version 9.2.5 on Fedora
& & Core 3.
& & Named listen to one IPv4 address and any IPv6 address. The configuration
& & has been running for many months. No changes where made recently to the
& & configuration except for adding or removing slave zones.
& & The symptom is that the server does not answer request to the IPv6
& & address + port UDP 53. It still answers requests to the UDP and TCP port
& & 53 using IPv4 and to the TCP port
53 using IPv6. Using dig on the
& & server, or on any server on the same LAN, leads to the following behavior :
& & - dig ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& & - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& & - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works fine
& & - dig ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works once or twice immediately
& & after restarting named, fails afterwards
& & The logs show the following message :
& & Jan 16 23:34:25 named[32125]: failed to get request's destination: failure
& & Jan 16 23:34:27 named[32125]: client.c:1325: unexpected error:
& & I had a look on client.c around line 1325 but it didn't help much.
& & Does someone on the list have an idea on what's wrong ?
& & Thanks very much in advance.
...
& Roland Dirlewanger a ?crit :
& & I have a very strange problem with a Bind server version 9.2.5 on Fedora
& & Core 3.
& & Named listen to one IPv4 address and any IPv6 address. The configuration
& & has been running for many months. No changes where made recently to the
& & configuration except for adding or removing slave zones.
& & The symptom is that the server does not answer request to the IPv6
& & address + port UDP 53. It still answers requests to the UDP and TCP port
& & 53 using IPv4 and to the TCP port
53 using IPv6. Using dig on the
& & server, or on any server on the same LAN, leads to the following behavior :
& & - dig ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& & - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv4-address : works fine
& & - dig +vc ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works fine
& & - dig ns some.domain @IPv6-address: works once or twice immediately
& & after restarting named, fails afterwards
& & The logs show the following message :
& & Jan 16 23:34:25 named[32125]: failed to get request's destination: failure
& & Jan 16 23:34:27 named[32125]: client.c:1325: unexpected error:
& I think I experienced a similar problem with BIND 9.2.4 on Debian Sarge.
& It seems to be triggered when the IPv6 UDP socket receives an IPv4
& request, which can occur in t...
Prabu wrote:
&Yes,there was a problem with Python build.Now,I have rebuild it,i am abl=
&import select and other modules.
So you solved it. Saw this too late, please ignore my last posting.
Der Inhalt dieser E-Mail ist vertraulich. Falls Sie nicht der angegebene
Empf=E4nger sind oder falls diese E-Mail irrt=FCmlich an Sie adressiert w=
verst=E4ndigen Sie bitte den Absender sofort und l=F6schen Sie die E-Mail
sodann. Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte =DCbermittlung sind n=
gestattet. Die Sicherheit von =DCbermittlungen per E-Mail kann nicht
garantiert werde...On Thu, 12 Jun :04 -0700,
&On Jun 12, 1:33 pm, &jingtai...@& &jingtai...@&
&& Dear all:
&& If I have text delimeter file or excel file and I used PROC IMPORT to
&& get a SAS data sets. My question is
&& 1. How can I electronically compare the SAS data sets and the ORIGINAL
&& one to make sure the data is correct. Currently we are MANUALLY
&& compare first , midd, last 10 records of each data sets and it is
&& really very...For multiple integrals, it's always a good idea to use a single Integrate call, not nested ones, as inner integrations may spawn conditions that the outer ones may not be able to handle. This works for me in versions 5.1 and 5.2:
In[1]:= (4!*Integrate[UnitStep[p4 - Pi, p5 - p2 - Pi, Pi - p3, Pi - p4 + p2, Pi - p5 + p3], {p2, 0, 2*Pi}, {p3, p2, 2*Pi}, {p4, p3, 2*Pi}, {p5, p4, 2*Pi}])/(2*Pi)^4
Out[1]= --
The n=6 case does take much longer, and it will probably return unevaluated.
Bhuvanesh,
Wolfram Research.
Web resources about - Re: preauth (timestamp) verify failure: Decrypt integrity check failed -- SOLVED - comp.protocols.kerberos
A timestamp is a sequence of characters or encoded information identifying when a certain event occurred, usually giving date and time of day, ...Get Emerald Timestamp on the App Store. See screenshots and ratings, and read customer reviews.we waited 68 minutesEven though its editing options are still limited, Google Photos' decoupling from Google+ has had a positive influence on the service and its ...A new jailbreak tweak called “Dater” automatically adds timestamps to images taken using the native Camera app.
Once downloaded and installed, ...... some of which are only accessible with touchscreen gestures. In previous versions of iOS, Apple only provided users with the occasional timestamp ...A common complaint I hear in the field (and see on the mailing lists) is that when you do a Get from TFS, the file’s timestamps are set to whatever ...... in iOS 7, with only a date stamp showing up at the top of each segment of messages that come in on a particular day. [...]
The post See Timestamps ...Hangouts for Android is receiving a solid update today that introduces stickers, smart suggestions in conversations, timestamps, and more. Announced ...After a half-day filibuster that was controversially halted by Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, Republicans in the Texas Senate scrambled to quickly ...Resources last updated: 3/10/:13 PM}